The results are in for Connecticut's first go-around with a high quality reading test required of all prospective teachers and they are not pretty.
Fully one-third of test-takers across the state failed the new licensing test. While this is good news for Connecticut's children--whose odds of getting a teacher who can't teach them to read just went down--it is a heart-breaking way for aspiring teachers to find out how ill-served they have been by their preparation programs. As one put it, "I took a bunch of classes in the elementary education program, but nothing prepared me for (the test)."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77031/77031c084a87805fc1ec0ee3cb4dd17539991903" alt=""
The response from some ed schools has been to question the validity of the test. As one professor at the Central Connecticut State University in New Britain noted: "We're giving students what they need to be good classroom teachers. Whether this test measures that is questionable. In many ways, the questions are worded in a very awkward way."
The results weren't all bad. There are several shining examples: Quinnipiac University, the University of Connecticut, and Teach For America all had high passing rates. Teach For America is an approved preparation program in Connecticut, and had a remarkable 93 percent first-time passing rate, the highest in the state.
To judge for yourself the awkwardness of the wording of the questions, look at the practice test: