June 2013
Welcome to Tr3 Trends, NCTQ’s monthly newsletter designed just for school district
officials. Each month we use data from
NCTQ’s Tr3 database to highlight the latest trends in school district
policies and collective bargaining agreements nationwide. Tr3 contains teacher policies from
114 school districts, including the 50 largest districts, the largest district
in each state, Broad Prize winners, Gates investment districts and members of
the Council of the Great City Schools. Teacher policies from all 50 states are also included. Subscribe here.
Conventional wisdom would tell us that suburban
schools can typically pay higher teacher salaries and enroll more affluent
children than their urban counterparts. But,
since the 1990s, suburban poverty has increased at a faster rate than poverty
in cities, and by 2011 there were three million more poor people living in
suburbs than in cities, according to the authors
of the new book Confronting Suburban
Poverty in America. How does this
population change affect school districts?
Is conventional wisdom out of date? This month we look at whether
teacher salaries vary with a school district’s geography.
We compare teacher
salaries in four types of school districts: urban, high-poverty suburban,
low-poverty suburban, and “mixed” districts. A mixed district includes both a city and county, such as Wake County
Schools in North Carolina (home to Raleigh) and Clark County School District in
Nevada (home to Las Vegas). Suburban
districts with free/reduced lunch rates higher than 50% were classified as
high-poverty. Of the 114 school districts in our Tr3 database, 70 are urban, 14
are low-poverty suburban, 10 are high-poverty suburban, and 20 are mixed.
Here’s what we
found when we compared these districts’ teacher salaries:
Average starting salaries in urban and suburban districts barely
differ; larger differences emerge towards the end of a teacher’s career, when
teachers in low-poverty suburban districts fare the best.
Teachers in “mixed” districts have the lowest salaries, on
average, at both the beginning and end of their careers.
We should note that we did not factor cost of living into our analysis,
which might affect the trends we see if cost of living were to vary by type of
district. We noticed, for instance, that
most of the districts we classified as “mixed” are in the Southeast (Florida,
Louisiana, North Carolina, to name a few states); if the cost of living in
these areas is significantly less than elsewhere, that might contribute to
mixed districts’ lower teacher salaries.
We zoomed in on five metro areas for which we
have detailed data for both urban centers and suburban areas: D.C., Atlanta,
Houston, Chicago, and Minneapolis-St. Paul.
All but Chicago buck the trend, with the core cities offering salaries about
equal to or greater than those in surrounding suburbs at both the beginning and
end of teachers’ careers.
The Chicago area, on the other hand, mirrored the overall trend for teachers
near the end of their careers. While Chicago
Public Schools offers the highest starting salary compared to nearby suburbs we
looked at, a nearby low-poverty suburban district offers about $15,000 more for
teachers with master’s degrees on the highest salary step.
Click here for a look at teacher salaries in all 114 school districts in our Tr3 database.
Go to Tr3’s custom report page to access all the data we use in Tr3 Trends and to compare teacher policies in 114 school districts nationwide. Send feedback to gmoored@nctq.org.
More like this

Beyond one-size-fits-all: The case for differentiated teacher compensation

Research that moved minds: Top Teacher Quality Bulletin articles of 2024

When “do no harm” is impossible, how can districts design teacher layoffs to do the least damage?
