Skip to Content
  • Teacher Compensation
  • Tr3 Trends: Teacher Salaries, Urban vs. Suburban

    June 27, 2013

    June 2013

    Welcome to Tr3 Trends, NCTQ’s monthly newsletter designed just for school district
    officials.  Each month we use data from
    NCTQ’s
    Tr3 database to highlight the latest trends in school district
    policies and collective bargaining agreements nationwide.  Tr3 contains teacher policies from
    114 school districts, including the 50 largest districts, the largest district
    in each state, Broad Prize winners, Gates investment districts and members of
    the Council of the Great City Schools.  Teacher policies from all 50 states are also included.  Subscribe here.  
     

    Conventional wisdom would tell us that suburban
    schools can typically pay higher teacher salaries and enroll more affluent
    children than their urban counterparts.  But,
    since the 1990s, suburban poverty has increased at a faster rate than poverty
    in cities, and by 2011 there were three million more poor people living in
    suburbs than in cities, according to the authors
    of the new book Confronting Suburban
    Poverty in America
    .  How does this
    population change affect school districts? 
    Is conventional wisdom out of date?  This month we look at whether
    teacher salaries vary with a school district’s geography.

    We compare teacher
    salaries in four types of school districts: urban, high-poverty suburban,
    low-poverty suburban, and “mixed” districts.  A mixed district includes both a city and county, such as Wake County
    Schools in North Carolina (home to Raleigh) and Clark County School District in
    Nevada (home to Las Vegas).  Suburban
    districts with free/reduced lunch rates higher than 50% were classified as
    high-poverty. Of the 114 school districts in our Tr3 database, 70 are urban, 14
    are low-poverty suburban, 10 are high-poverty suburban, and 20 are mixed.

    Here’s what we
    found when we compared these districts’ teacher salaries:

    Average starting salaries in urban and suburban districts barely
    differ; larger differences emerge towards the end of a teacher’s career, when
    teachers in low-poverty suburban districts fare the best.

    Teachers in “mixed” districts have the lowest salaries, on
    average, at both the beginning and end of their careers.

    We should note that we did not factor cost of living into our analysis,
    which might affect the trends we see if cost of living were to vary by type of
    district.  We noticed, for instance, that
    most of the districts we classified as “mixed” are in the Southeast (Florida,
    Louisiana, North Carolina, to name a few states); if the cost of living in
    these areas is significantly less than elsewhere, that might contribute to
    mixed districts’ lower teacher salaries.

    We zoomed in on five metro areas for which we
    have detailed data for both urban centers and suburban areas: D.C., Atlanta,
    Houston, Chicago, and Minneapolis-St. Paul. 
    All but Chicago buck the trend, with the core cities offering salaries about
    equal to or greater than those in surrounding suburbs at both the beginning and
    end of teachers’ careers. 

    The Chicago area, on the other hand, mirrored the overall trend for teachers
    near the end of their careers.  While Chicago
    Public Schools offers the highest starting salary compared to nearby suburbs we
    looked at, a nearby low-poverty suburban district offers about $15,000 more for
    teachers with master’s degrees on the highest salary step.

    Click here for a look at teacher salaries in all 114 school districts in our Tr3 database.

    Go to Tr3’s custom report page to access all the data we use in Tr3 Trends and to compare teacher policies in 114 school districts nationwide.  Send feedback to gmoored@nctq.org.

    More like this