Skip to Content
  • Unions & Contracts
  • October 2015: Length of contracts

    October 28, 2015

    District Trendline, previously known as Teacher Trendline, provides actionable research to improve district personnel policies that will strengthen the teacher workforce. Want evidence-based guidance on policies and practices that will enhance your ability to recruit, develop, and retain great teachers delivered right to your inbox each month? Subscribe here.

    The Trendline
    usually focuses on policy trends at the district level. This month, we’re
    taking a step back to consider the characteristics of teacher contracts and school
    board policy documents that govern the relationship between teachers and
    districts. Specifically, we’ll take a look at how long the typical contract
    term is, how many districts collectively bargain with their teachers and the
    status of teacher contracts in districts across the database.

    Length of contract

    The average term for teacher contracts across districts in
    the database is 2.82 years, up slightly from when
    we last examined
    this topic in 2013. The most common contract length is three years. New York currently has the longest
    contract length with an agreement covering nine years, followed by
    Boston which has a contract term of
    six years. 

    Of course the actual time period that contracts are in
    effect can vary greatly from the initially-determined length. Teacher contracts
    generally remain in effect until an agreement is reached on a new contract. For
    example,
    Buffalo is counted in the graph
    above as having a contract term of five years, although in reality the contract
    has been in effect for 16 years (from 1999 to present). If 16 years seems like
    a long time, that’s because it is; after
     on and off negotiations, wage freezes and a
    court case
    , the district and the union have almost exhausted
    all options for mediation
    set out in New York’s labor law.

    In other cases, newly minted contracts include retroactive
    years, connecting provisions of the new contract to years between the new and
    expired contracts.
    New York’s most
    recent contract was ratified in 2014 but retroactive to 2009, which explains
    the district’s unusually long contract term and contributes to its outlier
    status in the graph above.

    Status of teacher
    contracts and board policies

    The majority of districts in the database operate under
    collective bargaining agreements: while one-third of districts (39 of 121)
    generally operate under school board policies, two-thirds of the districts in
    the database (82 of 121) collectively bargain with teachers.
    [1]

    Of those districts with collective bargaining agreements,
    the majority (64 of 82) are operating under current teacher contracts while 18
    districts are operating under expired contracts.
    [2] Four of the districts with expired contracts have
    contracts that lapsed more than a year ago. The
    District of Columbia, Philadelphia and Providence are operating with contracts that expired in 2012, 2013 and 2014,
    respectively.
    Buffalo has been
    operating under an expired contract for over a decade, the last contract having
    expired in 2004.

    Among the districts that do not negotiate contracts and generally operate under board policy, the majority (24 of 39) are in states where collective bargaining is prohibited; the rest are in states where districts may choose whether or not to bargain if employees request to do so.  More information on the legality of collective bargaining can be found on the State Influence page of the database.

    Among the districts that do not collectively bargain, there
    are a few cases where districts have opted for some form of collaboration with
    teachers. In
    Harrison County (CO), the district
    works with teachers, who are not represented by a union, in a collaborative
    decision making process.
    Mesa (AZ) and Norfolk (VA) also work with
    teachers to outline working conditions and benefits, although the
    ultimate decision making authority rests with the district.

    The Teacher Contract Database is constantly being updated
    with the most recent changes in teacher contracts and board policies.
    Visit the
    database
    to see the latest agreements in 121 districts across the country
    and keep reading the
    Teacher Trendline to
    keep up with the latest trends in district policy. 


    [1]
    Milwaukee is counted as a district that operates under board policy. The
    district does continue to collectively bargain with the teachers union over
    base salaries, but all other working conditions are under full control of the
    district in accordance with Wisconsin state law.

    [2] At
    the time of writing, Pinellas County (FL) and Brevard County (FL) are
    technically operating under expired agreements, but tentative agreements in
    both districts have been reached with school board approval pending.