Skip to Content
  • Teacher Licensure
  • But, We Still Need Licensure Tests

    September 26, 2016

    Licensure tests:
    depending on who you ask, they’re either an important check on a prospective
    teacher’s knowledge before entering the profession or a burdensome requirement
    that keeps good candidates out of the classroom. A new
    study
    from CALDER researchers Dan Goldhaber, Trevor
    Gratz, and Roddy Theobald takes a look at the validity of a battery of tests
    taken by aspiring Washington state teachers.

    The researchers studied
    the relationship between two kinds of licensing tests used in the state and
    student performance. Specifically, they examined the basic skills test that
    almost every Washington teacher must take in order to gain admission to a
    teacher preparation program and subject matter tests, limited in this study to
    teachers taking secondary math and biology tests.

    The findings were
    mixed. The state’s basic skills test served as a “modest” predictor of student
    outcomes in math and ninth-grade biology. So, too, was the biology test quite
    predictive. However, the math test was not particularly effective in predicting
    student performance.

    What
    could explain a result that says subject matter knowledge in biology does
    matter but math does not?

    Author
    Dan Goldhaber offers this insight: “The short
    answer is that we really don’t fully understand these different results because
    there is so little evidence to date about what predicts the effectiveness of
    science teachers. A bit of speculation, however. It is important to remember
    here that we did find a relationship
    in math, just not as strong a one as might have been expected. After all,
    teachers who did better on the basic skills test—which includes math—were more
    effective. It would not surprise me if the math subject tests would have turned
    out to be more predictive for later high school math courses, such as calculus,
    where a teacher’s specific content knowledge of calculus is without question
    important.”

    To that point, we were
    surprised to read that this study was enough for at least one education
    advocacy group, MarylandCAN,
    to issue a call for the end to meaningless licensing tests—in our view, a
    hair’s breadth away from asserting that teacher’s subject matter knowledge
    doesn’t really matter. A slippery slope, indeed.

    More like this