After interning at the
National Council on Teacher Quality for a mere two weeks, I became acutely
aware of how little I knew about teacher preparation. As someone who wants to
be a teacher and has (or so I thought) done quite a bit of research about
preparation, I was startled by the gaps in my knowledge. After reflecting, I
believe that this resulted from a combination of factors: the first, that I
attend a small elite liberal arts college, and the second, that I want to
eventually be an elementary teacher. These factors shaped the way that I looked
at teacher preparation and meant that I simply did not know the information
about teacher prep that NCTQ has to offer in the Teacher Prep Review.
Let’s start with how my
college affected my thinking. Carleton,
like many highly selective liberal arts colleges, prides itself on its elite
status. Drawn to prestige, students of these colleges often overlook programs
that do not carry immediate name recognition. Around campus, saying you’re
attending a graduate teacher prep program just doesn’t carry the same weight as
law school or med school. The elite mindset that we carry renders us pretty
oblivious to the very valuable information NCTQ produces about graduate teacher
preparation schools.
In addition to that, because
I want to be an elementary teacher, I know firsthand that this area is too
often neglected at college campuses across the country; most liberal arts
colleges’ licensure programs only focus on secondary education. Of the top 10
liberal arts colleges as rated by US News, six have some sort of undergraduate licensure
program. That’s not too bad but only two have an elementary education option.
Additionally, the majority of these programs require advanced planning,
beginning during sophomore year, which ultimately rules out people who only
realize late in their college career that they might want to teach.
Where I see NCTQ’s work
making an impact on the thinking of students like me is through professors. The
elite attitude of campuses like Carleton
means that we are well exposed to highly selective programs, like Teach For America (TFA) or Boston Teacher Residency (BTR). These
programs recruit on campus and are well known by professors. The visibility of
these programs persuades applicants. If professors utilized NCTQ’s Teacher Prep Review, they would be able
to give more concrete advice about graduate education and perhaps this would
make a difference in students’ mindsets.
I wish there were an easy
solution to this problem—a way to alert education faculty at elite liberal arts
institutions to the gap in knowledge that students have about teacher prep.
Students should not feel that TFA or
BTR are the only options out there.
Information needs to be provided from sources such as NCTQ to fill in the
blanks and help guide students towards the best post-grad options for them.
Many students like me would be eager and grateful for this information.
More like this

National Council on Teacher Quality opposes the executive order to dismantle the Department of Education

Black History Month: Learning to read is a civil right

As seasons change, one thing remains the same: The persistent lack of diversity in the teacher workforce
