Skip to Content
  • Teacher Workforce Data
  • A drummed up teacher shortage crisis

    May 11, 2016

    Isn’t it amazing how someone or some things gain traction when the facts clearly aren’t on their side? 

    Just like the media handed off most of its airtime and column inches to elevate Donald Trump’s candidacy, so too is the media guilty of announcing a crisis in teacher supply when the facts just don’t support it.

    While there are no data to suggest we are in the midst of teacher shortage, there are certainly school districts that are experiencing real problems—but they’re largely the same school districts which have been struggling for years, even in times the media was reporting big teacher layoffs. 

    There are some data to suggest that enrollment has dropped considerably in some teacher preparation programs in some states. But as we’ll show, it’s a big leap to say that the drop in enrollment means there won’t be enough teachers. 

    These two graphs from economist
    Dan Goldhaber illustrate the importance of taking the long view.



    This first graph does indeed
    show that the number of new teachers produced since 2008 has declined. But keep
    in mind that that drop was preceded by a
    three-decade
    period of enrollment growth
    , far outpacing the demand year-in and year-out
    (as the second graph shows). America’s 1,450+ institutions which train teachers
    have been OVER-enrolling for years. 

    The current decline is what we
    normally see when unemployment dips and the pool of folks looking for work
    isn’t as large as in other years. 

    And as programs have not traditionally
    seen it as their responsibility to direct candidates to shortage teaching areas
    (e.g. special ed), there continue to be massive misalignment between the types
    of teachers trained and the types of teachers public schools need to hire. 

    Most notably, programs have been
    routinely graduating twice as many new elementary teachers as public schools
    hire each year. 

    Even when confronted with these
    facts, many districts have begun to panic. In part they have grown accustomed
    to dealing with a pretty distorted labor market and the low quality of many
    teacher candidates. They’re used to having to sort through a pile of resumes to
    find a single good hire. They are also often not nimble or flexible enough to
    adapt their recruiting and hiring practices to a tighter job market. 

     What then is a reasonable response to a
    downturn in teacher production?  It’s not
    to open the floodgates and let just anyone teach. We need to continue to
    encourage teacher prep programs to become more selective and do a better job
    preparing new teachers so that districts don’t have to count on 20 resumes to
    find a single qualified teacher. 

    Districts would do well to tap
    into the enormous pool of the many hundreds of thousands of people who were
    certified to teach but never did. Some estimates put the percentage of new
    teacher graduates who don’t actually teach at 50 percent. Neither states nor
    districts make it easy for those folks to reconsider the profession a few years
    down the road.

    More like this